logo
Login Join by grabbing a course
Preview unavailable

Latest posts

Courses

Practice Studio

  • Routine builder

  • Latest from Marc

  • Calendar

Conversation

  • 💬 Conversation
  • 👹 The Baritone Delusion
  • 😐 M1 suffering

Singing

  • 🎤 Share Your Singing
  • 🔱 M2 breakthroughs

VIP

  • ⭐️ Starter group
  • 🔮 Advanced Lounge

🚀 Navigation tools

  • How to share videos
  • Add the 🚀 to your phone (iOS)
  • Community guidelines
  • Get Practice Studio apps for free

⭐️ M2 Academy resources

  • Order of the program
  • Advanced guide for the program
  • How to play courses faster!
  • How to leave a course review!
  • Important tip for the program!
Back to M2 breakthroughs
Home 🔱 M2 breakthroughs & epiphanies The biggest reason mixed voice is worth it in the end

Notification Preferences

Forum Name : 🔱 M2 breakthroughs & epiphanies

The biggest reason mixed voice is worth it in the end

We see lip-synced, pitch corrected, Frankenstein-ed covers all the time. Can you know how many takes they did for that specific vocal line? In what seems to be an Instagramed version of the reality of singing, you might be holding yourself to unrealistic expectations and standards.

We might assume if they got the money-shot once, then they can always get it. Who knows? Yes, even the best singers have off days. But I'm pointing at the fact that a heavily lip-synced or edited cover means they couldn't even get through it once. That's it. It is multiple performances or attempts put into one.

How stressful does that sound? You might feel falsetto is a little goofy in the beginning but you're building a solid foundation that will never let you down. You will be able to do stuff live they can't even do in 30 takes. Keep at it.

Marc Ajax
December 29 at 11:25 PM

The biggest reason mixed voice is worth it in the end

We see lip-synced, pitch corrected, Frankenstein-ed covers all the time. Can you know how many takes they did for that specific vocal line? In what seems to be an Instagramed version of the reality of singing, you might be holding yourself to unrealistic expectations and standards.

We might assume if they got the money-shot once, then they can always get it. Who knows? Yes, even the best singers have off days. But I’m pointing at the fact that a heavily lip-synced or edited cover means they couldn’t even get through it once. That’s it. It is multiple performances or attempts put into one.

How stressful does that sound? You might feel falsetto is a little goofy in the beginning but you’re building a solid foundation that will never let you down. You will be able to do stuff live they can’t even do in 30 takes. Keep at it.

Total comments: 2

Leave a Comment
1 year ago
  • Report as Spam

man the Frankenstein-ed covers are the worst! imagine doing 50 takes and still using pitch correction to sound even more accurate than the original song 

what I hate is most don't realize this and praise these clowns in the comments 

take for instance those singing in the kitchen videos (apparently the best acoustically treated kitchens in the world with the best phone mics that sound like u87s) all pitch corrected to a grid 

and you'll find people in the comments praising them like it's a one in a billion voice 😭 😭 😭 😭 

the problem is this creates impossible standards, no one in the world can sing this perfectly in tune and honestly it's a bit lifeless and sounds bad especially in harmonies where they sound thin and fake almost like a synth

Next Post
Report Comment
logo

Login

Protected by reCAPTCHA

Forgot Password?

Forgot Password?

Back to login
logo

Register

This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
Sign in
Likes
🏆

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.
      Preview unavailable